Information on Result #518973
There is no (3, 9, 30006)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 9 224199 185482 212862 > 1289
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (3, 10, 30006)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction |