Information on Result #519011
There is no (3, 21, 2693)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 178 854442 265563 324128 933466 210857 193126 505536 > 12821
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (3, 22, 2693)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |