Information on Result #519167

There is no (6, 44, 4726)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 523 010554 618257 111281 350281 270575 964486 658678 570909 954547 338820 344547 804775 586451 891043 811082 > 12844

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (6, 45, 4726)-net in base 128 [i]m-Reduction