Information on Result #519267

There is no (8, 54, 6566)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 616454 486163 911206 082287 788210 630805 735706 300955 891096 155764 847993 889812 687120 256400 629955 852350 188462 433831 173616 > 12854

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (8, 55, 6566)-net in base 128 [i]m-Reduction