Information on Result #519267
There is no (8, 54, 6566)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 616454 486163 911206 082287 788210 630805 735706 300955 891096 155764 847993 889812 687120 256400 629955 852350 188462 433831 173616 > 12854
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (8, 55, 6566)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction |