Information on Result #519293
There is no (16, 56, 51953)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 10087 343689 325893 796511 666934 140923 993348 867167 935702 830500 909529 409501 037356 725510 444566 857047 087522 926689 719558 281016 > 12856
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (16, 57, 51953)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction |