Information on Result #519312
There is no (8, 58, 6191)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 165 893135 949445 009112 803973 793983 427661 533024 858809 941901 619705 578108 994556 727681 479472 948245 042300 504309 702180 194401 104332 > 12858
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (8, 59, 6191)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction |