Information on Result #519316
There is no (16, 58, 45135)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 165 337112 347670 919366 242638 899405 654506 600843 919472 295352 703988 571272 771205 366821 839466 744248 872222 713547 299951 449850 069432 > 12858
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (16, 59, 45135)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |