Information on Result #519351
There is no (17, 61, 49623)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 346 733944 433305 100266 290763 141729 193441 715685 093758 507436 658050 522366 850102 291722 818590 022552 039461 288722 587837 813727 498131 041637 > 12861
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (17, 62, 49623)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction |