Information on Result #519363
There is no (16, 62, 35549)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 44377 429029 042002 208790 351497 659956 968897 573716 380308 049691 024531 079500 044013 850094 074629 726340 225839 650323 055013 392775 324430 353080 > 12862
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (16, 63, 35549)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |