Information on Result #519391
There is no (22, 64, 180567)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 726 864871 665455 430221 321815 854361 459717 872568 857198 508398 929881 017181 582883 999498 922508 764612 911077 690722 690855 902264 594773 783586 580770 > 12864
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (22, 65, 180567)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction |