Information on Result #519391

There is no (22, 64, 180567)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 726 864871 665455 430221 321815 854361 459717 872568 857198 508398 929881 017181 582883 999498 922508 764612 911077 690722 690855 902264 594773 783586 580770 > 12864

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (22, 65, 180567)-net in base 128 [i]m-Reduction