Information on Result #519408
There is no (31, 65, 6443477)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 93035 536390 007185 071933 004476 460395 315744 762434 610185 532653 047430 113896 592612 270554 349098 172629 936610 550592 729838 240526 255614 380125 391292 > 12865
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (31, 66, 6443477)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |