Information on Result #519410
There is no (8, 66, 5728)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 11 942294 954920 443290 840773 021529 430429 876204 866248 973764 839033 189093 587030 137282 113727 745144 010984 224958 921225 574979 874130 983536 416956 275659 > 12866
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (8, 67, 5728)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |