Information on Result #519411
There is no (10, 66, 8232)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 11 933230 371180 193174 958856 865450 042983 179548 491590 077933 374024 248018 151988 152016 622306 360228 226403 972181 987477 388799 228829 683517 881633 634796 > 12866
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (10, 67, 8232)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction |