Information on Result #519429
There is no (21, 67, 102094)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 1524 368864 556303 903717 309811 504000 337384 549636 117561 898040 781392 695338 230080 895399 722473 282765 837044 896593 931859 895286 873900 924580 176173 332720 > 12867
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (21, 68, 102094)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |