Information on Result #519463
There is no (6, 70, 4083)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 3208 937350 523383 052808 750261 967897 365727 720835 075961 295632 864714 021981 846841 251817 395621 629695 133775 120087 792030 175606 306270 648838 290938 611955 644565 > 12870
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (6, 71, 4083)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (6, 72, 4083)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (6, 73, 4083)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (6, 74, 4083)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (6, 75, 4083)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (6, 76, 4083)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (6, 77, 4083)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (6, 78, 4083)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||