Information on Result #519464

There is no (8, 70, 5589)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 3212 944204 222274 060205 024078 667401 935171 339314 043172 686795 025104 936335 635913 142506 957320 040337 155749 119339 358653 775987 012903 759882 337172 260003 385152 > 12870

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (8, 71, 5589)-net in base 128 [i]m-Reduction