Information on Result #519555
There is no (20, 76, 46628)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 14062 123164 298632 548809 594005 844810 327701 595480 319084 234606 391756 094653 274124 899733 314584 284731 703744 375208 370029 216007 093961 097009 093959 270187 640165 400291 629608 > 12876
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (20, 77, 46628)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |