Information on Result #519568
There is no (15, 77, 16745)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 1 801283 236040 428114 165165 728427 027638 838600 818947 669652 141753 011213 457498 977209 091904 096708 906710 077917 915449 455738 917689 634452 017812 595601 998583 179468 573872 875424 > 12877
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (15, 78, 16745)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction |