Information on Result #519786

There is no (9, 45, 31051)-net in base 256, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 2 349092 736005 959769 274249 022396 602007 400371 684301 657474 621143 672606 973832 299763 783295 624299 667610 522907 264916 > 25645

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (9, 46, 31051)-net in base 256 [i]m-Reduction