Information on Result #519786
There is no (9, 45, 31051)-net in base 256, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 2 349092 736005 959769 274249 022396 602007 400371 684301 657474 621143 672606 973832 299763 783295 624299 667610 522907 264916 > 25645
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (9, 46, 31051)-net in base 256 | [i] | m-Reduction |