Information on Result #519982
There is no (9, 65, 17246)-net in base 256, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 3 434393 762509 125031 358521 405946 037166 892004 154402 456732 764105 149511 438450 240380 549560 434422 070596 699972 656494 939151 316120 470899 666025 619728 409333 995251 512641 > 25665
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 66, 17246)-net in base 256 | [i] | m-Reduction | |