Information on Result #520057
There is no (6, 21, 13)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(221, 13, S2, 3, 15), but
- the linear programming bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 10 713207 389057 045770 534912 / 5 095422 688314 993735 > 221 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (6, 22, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (6, 23, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (6, 24, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (6, 25, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (6, 26, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (6, 27, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (6, 28, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (6, 29, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (6, 30, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (6, 31, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (6, 32, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (6, 33, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (6, 34, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (6, 35, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (6, 36, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (6, 37, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (6, 38, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (6, 39, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (6, 40, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (6, 41, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (6, 42, 13)-net in base 2 | [i] |