Information on Result #520084
There is no (9, 28, 19)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(228, 19, S2, 2, 19), but
- the linear programming bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 21501 452180 765571 809280 / 74 685598 169693 > 228 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (9, 29, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (9, 30, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (9, 31, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (9, 32, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (9, 33, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (9, 34, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (9, 35, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (9, 36, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (9, 37, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (9, 38, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (9, 39, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (9, 40, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (9, 41, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (9, 42, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (9, 43, 19)-net in base 2 | [i] |