Information on Result #520085
There is no (9, 44, 17)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(244, 17, S2, 3, 35), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 562 949953 421312 / 27 > 244 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 45, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (9, 46, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (9, 47, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (9, 48, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (9, 49, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (9, 50, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (9, 51, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (9, 52, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (9, 53, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (9, 54, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (9, 55, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (9, 56, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (9, 57, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||