Information on Result #520136
There is no (15, 66, 24)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(266, 24, S2, 3, 51), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 1180 591620 717411 303424 / 13 > 266 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (15, 67, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (15, 68, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (15, 69, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (15, 70, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (15, 71, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (15, 72, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (15, 73, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (15, 74, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (15, 75, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (15, 76, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (15, 77, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (15, 78, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (15, 79, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (15, 80, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (15, 81, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (15, 82, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (15, 83, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (15, 84, 24)-net in base 2 | [i] |