Information on Result #520154

There is no (18, 57, 32)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(257, 32, S2, 2, 39), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (18, 58, 32)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (18, 59, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (18, 60, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (18, 61, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (18, 62, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (18, 63, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (18, 64, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (18, 65, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (18, 66, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (18, 67, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (18, 68, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (18, 69, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (18, 70, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (18, 71, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (18, 72, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (18, 73, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (18, 74, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (18, 75, 32)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (18, 76, 32)-net in base 2 [i]