Information on Result #520154
There is no (18, 57, 32)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(257, 32, S2, 2, 39), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 792633 534417 207296 / 5 > 257 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (18, 58, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (18, 59, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (18, 60, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (18, 61, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (18, 62, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (18, 63, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (18, 64, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (18, 65, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (18, 66, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (18, 67, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (18, 68, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (18, 69, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (18, 70, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (18, 71, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (18, 72, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (18, 73, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (18, 74, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (18, 75, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (18, 76, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] |