Information on Result #520170
There is no (20, 84, 30)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(284, 30, S2, 3, 64), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 309 485009 821345 068724 781056 / 13 > 284 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (20, 85, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (20, 86, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (20, 87, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (20, 88, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (20, 89, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (20, 90, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (20, 91, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (20, 92, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (20, 93, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (20, 94, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (20, 95, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (20, 96, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (20, 97, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (20, 98, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (20, 99, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (20, 100, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (20, 101, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (20, 102, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (20, 103, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (20, 104, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (20, 105, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (20, 106, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (20, 107, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (20, 108, 30)-net in base 2 | [i] |