Information on Result #520170

There is no (20, 84, 30)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(284, 30, S2, 3, 64), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (20, 85, 30)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (20, 86, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (20, 87, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (20, 88, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (20, 89, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (20, 90, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (20, 91, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (20, 92, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (20, 93, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (20, 94, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (20, 95, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (20, 96, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (20, 97, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (20, 98, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (20, 99, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (20, 100, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (20, 101, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (20, 102, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (20, 103, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (20, 104, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (20, 105, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
22No (20, 106, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
23No (20, 107, 30)-net in base 2 [i]
24No (20, 108, 30)-net in base 2 [i]