Information on Result #520178
There is no (21, 87, 31)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(287, 31, S2, 3, 66), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 11141 460353 568422 474092 118016 / 67 > 287 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (21, 88, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (21, 89, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (21, 90, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (21, 91, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (21, 92, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (21, 93, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (21, 94, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (21, 95, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (21, 96, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (21, 97, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (21, 98, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (21, 99, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (21, 100, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (21, 101, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (21, 102, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (21, 103, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (21, 104, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (21, 105, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (21, 106, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (21, 107, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (21, 108, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (21, 109, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (21, 110, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (21, 111, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (21, 112, 31)-net in base 2 | [i] |