Information on Result #520186

There is no (22, 91, 33)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(291, 33, S2, 3, 69), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (22, 92, 33)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (22, 93, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (22, 94, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (22, 95, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (22, 96, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (22, 97, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (22, 98, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (22, 99, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (22, 100, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (22, 101, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (22, 102, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (22, 103, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (22, 104, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (22, 105, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (22, 106, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (22, 107, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (22, 108, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (22, 109, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (22, 110, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (22, 111, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (22, 112, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
22No (22, 113, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
23No (22, 114, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
24No (22, 115, 33)-net in base 2 [i]
25No (22, 116, 33)-net in base 2 [i]