Information on Result #520196
There is no (23, 121, 32)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2121, 32, S2, 4, 98), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 340 282366 920938 463463 374607 431768 211456 / 99 > 2121 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (23, 122, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (23, 123, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (23, 124, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (23, 125, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (23, 126, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (23, 127, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (23, 128, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (23, 129, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (23, 130, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (23, 131, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (23, 132, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (23, 133, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (23, 134, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (23, 135, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (23, 136, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (23, 137, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (23, 138, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (23, 139, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (23, 140, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (23, 141, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (23, 142, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (23, 143, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (23, 144, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (23, 145, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (23, 146, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (23, 147, 32)-net in base 2 | [i] |