Information on Result #520202
There is no (24, 74, 40)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(274, 40, S2, 2, 50), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 1 208925 819614 629174 706176 / 51 > 274 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (24, 75, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (24, 76, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (24, 77, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (24, 78, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (24, 79, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (24, 80, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (24, 81, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (24, 82, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (24, 83, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (24, 84, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (24, 85, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (24, 86, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (24, 87, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (24, 88, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (24, 89, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (24, 90, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (24, 91, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (24, 92, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (24, 93, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (24, 94, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (24, 95, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (24, 96, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (24, 97, 40)-net in base 2 | [i] |