Information on Result #520212
There is no (25, 102, 36)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2102, 36, S2, 3, 77), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 81 129638 414606 681695 789005 144064 / 13 > 2102 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (25, 103, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (25, 104, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (25, 105, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (25, 106, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (25, 107, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (25, 108, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (25, 109, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (25, 110, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (25, 111, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (25, 112, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (25, 113, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (25, 114, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (25, 115, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (25, 116, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (25, 117, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (25, 118, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (25, 119, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (25, 120, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (25, 121, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (25, 122, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (25, 123, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (25, 124, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (25, 125, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (25, 126, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (25, 127, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (25, 128, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] |