Information on Result #520229

There is no (27, 110, 39)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2110, 39, S2, 3, 83), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (27, 111, 39)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (27, 112, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (27, 113, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (27, 114, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (27, 115, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (27, 116, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (27, 117, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (27, 118, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (27, 119, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (27, 120, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (27, 121, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (27, 122, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (27, 123, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (27, 124, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (27, 125, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (27, 126, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (27, 127, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (27, 128, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (27, 129, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (27, 130, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (27, 131, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
22No (27, 132, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
23No (27, 133, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
24No (27, 134, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
25No (27, 135, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
26No (27, 136, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
27No (27, 137, 39)-net in base 2 [i]
28No (27, 138, 39)-net in base 2 [i]