Information on Result #520229
There is no (27, 110, 39)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2110, 39, S2, 3, 83), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 15576 890575 604482 885591 488987 660288 / 7 > 2110 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (27, 111, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (27, 112, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (27, 113, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (27, 114, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (27, 115, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (27, 116, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (27, 117, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (27, 118, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (27, 119, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (27, 120, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (27, 121, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (27, 122, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (27, 123, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (27, 124, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (27, 125, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (27, 126, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (27, 127, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (27, 128, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (27, 129, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (27, 130, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (27, 131, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (27, 132, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (27, 133, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (27, 134, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (27, 135, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (27, 136, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
27 | No (27, 137, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
28 | No (27, 138, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] |