Information on Result #520248
There is no (29, 88, 47)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(288, 47, S2, 2, 59), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 1237 940039 285380 274899 124224 / 3 > 288 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (29, 89, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (29, 90, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (29, 91, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (29, 92, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (29, 93, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (29, 94, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (29, 95, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (29, 96, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (29, 97, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (29, 98, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (29, 99, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (29, 100, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (29, 101, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (29, 102, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (29, 103, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (29, 104, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (29, 105, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (29, 106, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (29, 107, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (29, 108, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (29, 109, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (29, 110, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (29, 111, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (29, 112, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (29, 113, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (29, 114, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
27 | No (29, 115, 47)-net in base 2 | [i] |