Information on Result #520258
There is no (30, 119, 42)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2119, 42, S2, 3, 89), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 10 633823 966279 326983 230456 482242 756608 / 15 > 2119 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (30, 120, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (30, 121, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (30, 122, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (30, 123, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (30, 124, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (30, 125, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (30, 126, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (30, 127, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (30, 128, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (30, 129, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (30, 130, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (30, 131, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (30, 132, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (30, 133, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (30, 134, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (30, 135, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (30, 136, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (30, 137, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (30, 138, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (30, 139, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (30, 140, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (30, 141, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (30, 142, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (30, 143, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (30, 144, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (30, 145, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
27 | No (30, 146, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
28 | No (30, 147, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
29 | No (30, 148, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
30 | No (30, 149, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
31 | No (30, 150, 42)-net in base 2 | [i] |