Information on Result #520266
There is no (31, 93, 50)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(293, 50, S2, 2, 62), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 633825 300114 114700 748351 602688 / 63 > 293 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (31, 94, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (31, 95, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (31, 96, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (31, 97, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (31, 98, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (31, 99, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (31, 100, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (31, 101, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (31, 102, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (31, 103, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (31, 104, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (31, 105, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (31, 106, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (31, 107, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (31, 108, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (31, 109, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (31, 110, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (31, 111, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (31, 112, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (31, 113, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (31, 114, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (31, 115, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (31, 116, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (31, 117, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (31, 118, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (31, 119, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
27 | No (31, 120, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
28 | No (31, 121, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
29 | No (31, 122, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] |