Information on Result #520285
There is no (33, 99, 53)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(299, 53, S2, 2, 66), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 60 847228 810955 011271 841753 858048 / 67 > 299 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (33, 100, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (33, 101, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (33, 102, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (33, 103, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (33, 104, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (33, 105, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (33, 106, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (33, 107, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (33, 108, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (33, 109, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (33, 110, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (33, 111, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (33, 112, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (33, 113, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (33, 114, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (33, 115, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (33, 116, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (33, 117, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (33, 118, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (33, 119, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (33, 120, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (33, 121, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (33, 122, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (33, 123, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (33, 124, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (33, 125, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
27 | No (33, 126, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
28 | No (33, 127, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
29 | No (33, 128, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
30 | No (33, 129, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
31 | No (33, 130, 53)-net in base 2 | [i] |