Information on Result #520295
There is no (34, 102, 54)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2102, 54, S2, 2, 68), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 162 259276 829213 363391 578010 288128 / 23 > 2102 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (34, 103, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (34, 104, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (34, 105, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (34, 106, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (34, 107, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (34, 108, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (34, 109, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (34, 110, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (34, 111, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (34, 112, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (34, 113, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (34, 114, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (34, 115, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (34, 116, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (34, 117, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (34, 118, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (34, 119, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (34, 120, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (34, 121, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (34, 122, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (34, 123, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (34, 124, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (34, 125, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (34, 126, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (34, 127, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (34, 128, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
27 | No (34, 129, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
28 | No (34, 130, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
29 | No (34, 131, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
30 | No (34, 132, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
31 | No (34, 133, 54)-net in base 2 | [i] |