Information on Result #520315
There is no (36, 107, 57)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2107, 57, S2, 2, 71), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 649 037107 316853 453566 312041 152512 / 3 > 2107 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (36, 108, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (36, 109, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (36, 110, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (36, 111, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (36, 112, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (36, 113, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (36, 114, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (36, 115, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (36, 116, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (36, 117, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (36, 118, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (36, 119, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (36, 120, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (36, 121, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (36, 122, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (36, 123, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (36, 124, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (36, 125, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (36, 126, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (36, 127, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (36, 128, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (36, 129, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (36, 130, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (36, 131, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (36, 132, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (36, 133, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
27 | No (36, 134, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
28 | No (36, 135, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
29 | No (36, 136, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
30 | No (36, 137, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
31 | No (36, 138, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
32 | No (36, 139, 57)-net in base 2 | [i] |