Information on Result #520559
There is no (61, 229, 79)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2229, 79, S2, 3, 168), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 248462 868484 460296 347651 211041 972916 288239 922998 133915 985850 872056 774656 / 169 > 2229 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (61, 230, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (61, 231, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (61, 232, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (61, 233, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (61, 234, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (61, 235, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (61, 236, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (61, 237, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (61, 238, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (61, 239, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (61, 240, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (61, 241, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (61, 242, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (61, 243, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (61, 244, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (61, 245, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (61, 246, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (61, 247, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (61, 248, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (61, 249, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (61, 250, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (61, 251, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (61, 252, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (61, 253, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (61, 254, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (61, 255, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
27 | No (61, 256, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
28 | No (61, 257, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
29 | No (61, 258, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
30 | No (61, 259, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
31 | No (61, 260, 79)-net in base 2 | [i] |