MinT - Information on Result #520572

Information on Result #520572

There is no (63, 235, 81)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2²³⁵, 81, S₂, 3, 172), but

the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that MÂ â‰¥ 12 367929 453448 690307 083082 505200 429610 792387 278129 332706 851243 409048 338432 / 173 > 2²³⁵ [i]

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

	Result		This result only	Method
1	No (63, 236, 81)-net in base 2	[i]		m-Reduction
2	No (63, 237, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
3	No (63, 238, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
4	No (63, 239, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
5	No (63, 240, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
6	No (63, 241, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
7	No (63, 242, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
8	No (63, 243, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
9	No (63, 244, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
10	No (63, 245, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
11	No (63, 246, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
12	No (63, 247, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
13	No (63, 248, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
14	No (63, 249, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
15	No (63, 250, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
16	No (63, 251, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
17	No (63, 252, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
18	No (63, 253, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
19	No (63, 254, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
20	No (63, 255, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
21	No (63, 256, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
22	No (63, 257, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
23	No (63, 258, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
24	No (63, 259, 81)-net in base 2	[i]
25	No (63, 260, 81)-net in base 2	[i]