Information on Result #520590
There is no (67, 135, 146)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2135, 146, S2, 68), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 9 756576 024357 147624 421876 744283 658158 866432 / 205 > 2135 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (67, 136, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (67, 137, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (67, 138, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (67, 139, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (67, 140, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (67, 141, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (67, 142, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (67, 143, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (67, 144, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (67, 145, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (67, 146, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (67, 147, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (67, 148, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (67, 149, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (67, 150, 146)-net in base 2 | [i] |