Information on Result #520993

There is no (131, 239, 292)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2239, 292, S2, 108), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (131, 240, 292)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (131, 241, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (131, 242, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (131, 243, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (131, 244, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (131, 245, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (131, 246, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (131, 247, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (131, 248, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (131, 249, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (131, 250, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (131, 251, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (131, 252, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (131, 253, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (131, 254, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (131, 255, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (131, 256, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (131, 257, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (131, 258, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (131, 259, 292)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (131, 260, 292)-net in base 2 [i]