Information on Result #521074

There is no (10, 58, 31)-net in base 3, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(358, 31, S3, 2, 48), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (10, 59, 31)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (10, 60, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (10, 61, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (10, 62, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (10, 63, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (10, 64, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (10, 65, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (10, 66, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (10, 67, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (10, 68, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (10, 69, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (10, 70, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (10, 71, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (10, 72, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (10, 73, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (10, 74, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (10, 75, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (10, 76, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (10, 77, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
20No (10, 78, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
21No (10, 79, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
22No (10, 80, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
23No (10, 81, 31)-net in base 3 [i]
24No (10, 82, 31)-net in base 3 [i]