Information on Result #521330

There is no (29, 208, 71)-net in base 3, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(3208, 71, S3, 3, 179), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (29, 209, 71)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (29, 210, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (29, 211, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (29, 212, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (29, 213, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (29, 214, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (29, 215, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (29, 216, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (29, 217, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (29, 218, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (29, 219, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (29, 220, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (29, 221, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (29, 222, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (29, 223, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (29, 224, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (29, 225, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (29, 226, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (29, 227, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
20No (29, 228, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
21No (29, 229, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
22No (29, 230, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
23No (29, 231, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
24No (29, 232, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
25No (29, 233, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
26No (29, 234, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
27No (29, 235, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
28No (29, 236, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
29No (29, 237, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
30No (29, 238, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
31No (29, 239, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
32No (29, 240, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
33No (29, 241, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
34No (29, 242, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
35No (29, 243, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
36No (29, 244, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
37No (29, 245, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
38No (29, 246, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
39No (29, 247, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
40No (29, 248, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
41No (29, 249, 71)-net in base 3 [i]
42No (29, 250, 71)-net in base 3 [i]