Information on Result #523743

There is no (13, 66, 287)-net in base 9, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(966, 287, S9, 53), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (13, 67, 287)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction
2No (13, 68, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
3No (13, 69, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
4No (13, 70, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
5No (13, 71, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
6No (13, 72, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
7No (13, 73, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
8No (13, 74, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
9No (13, 75, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
10No (13, 76, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
11No (13, 77, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
12No (13, 78, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
13No (13, 79, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
14No (13, 80, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
15No (13, 81, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
16No (13, 82, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
17No (13, 83, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
18No (13, 84, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
19No (13, 85, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
20No (13, 86, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
21No (13, 87, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
22No (13, 88, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
23No (13, 89, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
24No (13, 90, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
25No (13, 91, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
26No (13, 92, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
27No (13, 93, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
28No (13, 94, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
29No (13, 95, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
30No (13, 96, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
31No (13, 97, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
32No (13, 98, 287)-net in base 9 [i]
33No (13, 99, 287)-net in base 9 [i]