Information on Result #524050

There is no (1, 9, 124)-net in base 25, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(259, 124, S25, 8), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (1, 10, 124)-net in base 25 [i]m-Reduction
2No (1, 11, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
3No (1, 12, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
4No (1, 13, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
5No (1, 14, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
6No (1, 15, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
7No (1, 16, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
8No (1, 17, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
9No (1, 18, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
10No (1, 19, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
11No (1, 20, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
12No (1, 21, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
13No (1, 22, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
14No (1, 23, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
15No (1, 24, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
16No (1, 25, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
17No (1, 26, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
18No (1, 27, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
19No (1, 28, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
20No (1, 29, 124)-net in base 25 [i]
21No (1, 30, 124)-net in base 25 [i]