Information on Result #546165
There is no linear OA(241, 48, F2, 22) (dual of [48, 7, 23]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(219, 25, F2, 11) (dual of [25, 6, 12]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(218, 24, F2, 10) (dual of [24, 6, 11]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(28, 13, F2, 5) (dual of [13, 5, 6]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(27, 12, F2, 4) (dual of [12, 5, 5]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(28, 13, F2, 5) (dual of [13, 5, 6]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OA(242, 49, F2, 23) (dual of [49, 7, 24]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
2 | No linear OOA(241, 48, F2, 2, 22) (dual of [(48, 2), 55, 23]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
3 | No linear OOA(241, 48, F2, 3, 22) (dual of [(48, 3), 103, 23]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | No linear OOA(241, 48, F2, 4, 22) (dual of [(48, 4), 151, 23]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | No linear OOA(241, 48, F2, 5, 22) (dual of [(48, 5), 199, 23]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
6 | No linear OOA(241, 48, F2, 6, 22) (dual of [(48, 6), 247, 23]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
7 | No linear OOA(241, 48, F2, 7, 22) (dual of [(48, 7), 295, 23]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
8 | No linear OOA(241, 48, F2, 8, 22) (dual of [(48, 8), 343, 23]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
9 | No linear OA(285, 93, F2, 44) (dual of [93, 8, 45]-code) | [i] | Residual Code |