Information on Result #546332

There is no linear OA(2171, 192, F2, 84) (dual of [192, 21, 85]-code), because residual code would yield OA(287, 107, S2, 42), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2172, 193, F2, 85) (dual of [193, 21, 86]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2172, 192, F2, 2, 85) (dual of [(192, 2), 212, 86]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(2171, 192, F2, 2, 84) (dual of [(192, 2), 213, 85]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2171, 192, F2, 3, 84) (dual of [(192, 3), 405, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2171, 192, F2, 4, 84) (dual of [(192, 4), 597, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2171, 192, F2, 5, 84) (dual of [(192, 5), 789, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2171, 192, F2, 6, 84) (dual of [(192, 6), 981, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2171, 192, F2, 7, 84) (dual of [(192, 7), 1173, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2171, 192, F2, 8, 84) (dual of [(192, 8), 1365, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (87, 171, 192)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array