Information on Result #546666

There is no linear OA(3151, 185, F3, 99) (dual of [185, 34, 100]-code), because residual code would yield OA(352, 85, S3, 33), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(3152, 186, F3, 100) (dual of [186, 34, 101]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(3153, 187, F3, 101) (dual of [187, 34, 102]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(3152, 185, F3, 2, 100) (dual of [(185, 2), 218, 101]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(3153, 185, F3, 2, 101) (dual of [(185, 2), 217, 102]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(3151, 185, F3, 2, 99) (dual of [(185, 2), 219, 100]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(3151, 185, F3, 3, 99) (dual of [(185, 3), 404, 100]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(3151, 185, F3, 4, 99) (dual of [(185, 4), 589, 100]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(3151, 185, F3, 5, 99) (dual of [(185, 5), 774, 100]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (52, 151, 185)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array