Information on Result #546672

There is no linear OA(3157, 262, F3, 99) (dual of [262, 105, 100]-code), because residual code would yield OA(358, 162, S3, 33), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(3158, 263, F3, 100) (dual of [263, 105, 101]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(3159, 264, F3, 101) (dual of [264, 105, 102]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(3158, 262, F3, 2, 100) (dual of [(262, 2), 366, 101]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(3159, 262, F3, 2, 101) (dual of [(262, 2), 365, 102]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(3157, 262, F3, 2, 99) (dual of [(262, 2), 367, 100]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(3157, 262, F3, 3, 99) (dual of [(262, 3), 629, 100]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(3157, 262, F3, 4, 99) (dual of [(262, 4), 891, 100]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(3157, 262, F3, 5, 99) (dual of [(262, 5), 1153, 100]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (58, 157, 262)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array